Today we visited Egeskov, on the island of Fyn. This enormous estate and castle is privately owned by the same family that originally had it built in the 16th century. They have kept it in pristine condition, turning the castle itself into a sort of museum and carefully maintaining the lawns and gardens. Today, Egeskov is a tourist attraction and family-oriented establishment – it has entry fees, a gift shop, cafés, museums, tours and an amazing playground that made me wish I had been there as a ten-year-old.
![]() |
thanks, google |
i took a picture of the map. lots going on here. |
But this blog question is tough, because the situation depends so heavily on the ownership of the grounds. Egeskov is an example of proper management, but I can think of all sorts of ways that a private owner could let a place like this go to waste. If owners are not entrepreneurial in their approach, these old buildings and gardens are impossible to maintain without a fortune.
The benefits of private ownership seem to outweigh the costs, though. Each site gets its own flavor from its historic ownership, and does not have to comply with national regulations and standards for public parks. In addition, a model like Egeskov can motivate and inspire other families to turn their expensive properties into public amenities that can actually pay out.
Cheers,
Robin
![]() |
exploring the grounds |
part of the famous fuchsia collection |
the 16th century renaissance castle |
![]() |
the inside is filled with exhibits from the family |
![]() |
structure inside a turret |
No comments:
Post a Comment