Friday, May 29, 2015

Public Urban Greenspace

What functions does public urban greenspace perform in a city in general, and specifically in Copenhagen?

Public greenspace, like a city street or a room in a house, is a multipurpose environment. Some are created for very specific uses, while others accommodate almost any activity imaginable. What differentiates these greenspaces is the intention with which they were conceived. It seems to me that there are three categories of intention that encompass most public greenspace in an urban context:


1. Environmentally performative

Greenspace is one of nature's tools. Urban environments generally tend to be engineered as hardscapes, dominated by roads, sidewalks and buildings with impermeable roofs. Most water is handled through troughs, gutters and underground stormwater and sewer systems that carry it away, unseen until the occasional overflow. Greenspace can be used to mitigate that overflow, and to reduce the need for these systems in general. Soil and plants have a holding capacity for water that can slow down runoff or delay it for extended periods of time. These plants can also improve air quality and mitigate heat island effect if properly implemented.

2. Psychological / Aesthetic

Many greenspaces are intended to "beautify" urban environments. Flower beds often hold no purpose other than to change the look and feel of a space (obviously important from a design standpoint). Though I am not a psychology student, I know that providing views of plants can improve the moods and learning capacities of users. Beds can be as small as a window box or as grand-scale as the parterres and flowers at Versailles. This psychological effect is especially important in cities, where people are constantly surrounded by hard surfaces, sharp angles and loud noises.

3. Recreational / Social

Shared public space inherently encourages interaction, and greenspace invites recreation and relaxation. Many greenspaces are intended for play, exercise, picnics and socializing, but the mistake of a one-size-fits-all solution is often made. Our reading from class states the issue:
One of the problems with the simplistic notion that more parks are required when density is increased is that it does not consider the characteristics of people living in higher density environments. The idea assumes a homogeneous population of townhouse and apartment dwellers who need access to a generic park. –Jason Byrne and Neil Sipe. Griffith University Urban Research Program. Green and open space planning for urban consolidation – A review of the literature and best practice. March 2011.
The key here is specificity. For a recreational and social greenspace to really work, the users and surroundings must be sufficiently researched and understood.


garden beds in a cobblestone square near Kastellet

Greenspace in Copenhagen seems well orchestrated and highly valued by its users. Most of the parks that I have visited were in use: families walking dogs and pushing strollers, fitness buffs out for a run, couples riding bicycles, people laying about on blankets, and the occasional down-and-out individual with a cigarette and a pile of belongings.

Beyond the generic purposes that I have outlined already, Copenhagen uses greenspace as a planning tool. The Five Finger plan for urban development is exactly what it sounds like: five corridors of buildings, streets and public transportation that extend from the city center. These corridors are separated by wedges of greenspace, giving all residents easy access.

As we saw in our parks tour on Thursday, greenspace has also been integrated historically as the city developed. As Copenhagen transitioned from a medieval fortress to a larger defensible area with a moat, and eventually to a large metropolitan environment, the land had to be adapted over and over. Former moats are now urban ponds surrounded by green spaces. The military fort Kastellet is now home to a memorial for Denmark's troops and a gorgeous walking path that follows the pentagonal earthen walls. Repurposing these antiquated infrastructures is not only cheaper than totally razing and reworking them, but it can improve urban environments and the lives of urban citizens.
memorial to Denmark's deployed troops:
ONE TIME – ONE PLACE – ONE HUMAN BEING

walking along Kastellet's wall, looking back towards the gate

looking out to sea from Kastellet


This post focused mainly on the historic parks of Copenhagen. Next week, I'll be touring the more modern ones. Stay tuned for that write-up on Monday or Tuesday.

Robin

Wednesday, May 27, 2015

Lejre: The Land of Legends

Based on your visit today to Lejre, summarize the impact that the Danish landscape has on the Danish as a people, and vice versa.


Lejre: The Land of Legends is a Danish national park and interactive historical site. It is located on the island of Sjaelland (say: Zealand), almost directly west of Copenhagen, about a 45 minutes trip by car. Today, I was lucky enough to be guided through this magical landscape by a talkative Danish tour guide with impeccable english.

strolling through the greenery
our guide showing off a wild boar tusk

The early Stone Age in current-day Denmark was marked by cold temperatures, heavy and frequent snows, and reindeer and aurochs as staple prey. Subsistence living was accomplished by hunting with flint-tipped spears and following the seasons. A following period of warming drove reindeer away and led to intense forest growth and sea level rise. Denmark was now a series of wooded islands with a climate similar to Greece today; Danes responded with dugout wooden boats and fishing spears. When the climate again cooled, bringing it close to the temperature and humidity of today, the Danes were entering the bronze age and were able to set up farming operations in more permanent locations. People burnt down patches of forest and used more advanced tools to work the land.


boats!
The early Danes were nomadic hunter-gatherers controlled by their environment. Entire lives were dictated by seasons, climate, weather and the response of animals and plants to those criteria. The diet, tools, weapons and structures of these people were dependent on the landscape they inhabited.


a stone-age dane and his abode by the lake
Today, Lejre represents a rare piece of wilderness; Denmark is a small country that has been well-populated by humans for a long time, meaning almost all of the landmass has been manually altered in some way. Today, 9% of Denmark's land remains wild, the rest being heavily manicured or managed by humans. To add to that statistic:

62% of land-use is agricultural
13% of land is forested, managed as a resource, currently increasing due to national policy
10% of land has been built upon
9% of land is natural wilderness
2% of land is covered by lakes and water courses
450 total islands exist in Denmark
90 of Denmark's islands are populated
16,639 sq mi /43,094 sq km is the size of Denmark proper
32.3 mi / 52 km is the furthest one can get from the Sea in Denmark
source: instructor Toby Musgrave and Wikipedia



Towards the end of our tour today, our guide posed a question (paraphrased from memory and notes): Now that we have made our mark on the landscape, why should we preserve what is left? What role does the land play in society and the environment, and how do we justify funding its preservation when it is a valuable commercial resource as well? Her answer involved the telling of stories using landscapes as visual aids, and the opportunity to maintain a strong sense of history and heritage among the Danish people. But I would answer her question with another: what is the definition of wilderness?

Lejre is a landscape affected by thousands of years of human activity. Today, it is owned by a group committed to restoring the land to its prehistoric state. The group is reintroducing species like wild boar and a modern imitation breed of the aurochs; they have rebuilt the architectures of antiquity based on found remains; they have built dugout canoes; they dress in stone-age garb and give tours and facilitate learning opportunities. In doing all of these wonderful things for educational purposes, are they really recreating wilderness? are they simply providing a pastoral image of what might have been? are they destroying a current landscape to understand an old one? And does any of this matter in the grand scheme of environmental integrity?

I'll leave you with these questions. I, for one, had a fantastic time wandering the woodland paths – a welcome break from the city after three hectic days. I think Lejre is a great resource and opportunity for the people of Copenhagen, of all ages.

Skål! Cheers!

Robin


thanks for the shot, McKenzie!